<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Vocabulary Word: E-Panties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/</link>
	<description>Life &#38; Lessons from before, during, and after my time in the service industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:21:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Got Five on It Friday – Volume IV &#171; The Restaurant Refugee</title>
		<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I Got Five on It Friday – Volume IV &#171; The Restaurant Refugee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restaurantrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] e-Panties [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e-Panties [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freckledk</title>
		<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[freckledk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restaurantrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who wears panties anymore?  E or otherwise?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who wears panties anymore?  E or otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LivitLuvit</title>
		<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LivitLuvit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restaurantrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the male version should be e-jizzed. Vulgar, I know, but don&#039;t people like that sort of remind you of the guy who would totally be in the corner on the metro late at night, fumbling under his trench coat?

&lt;strong&gt;really? I mean really? we had to go there?  How do you expect me to scrub that image out of my head now?&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the male version should be e-jizzed. Vulgar, I know, but don&#8217;t people like that sort of remind you of the guy who would totally be in the corner on the metro late at night, fumbling under his trench coat?</p>
<p><strong>really? I mean really? we had to go there?  How do you expect me to scrub that image out of my head now?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryane</title>
		<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restaurantrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, that is interesting. Why do you say so?? I mean, as a wearer of thongs, I do agree that at times, they are over-rated.  But in terms of how they look underneath certain clothing, pants and skirts etc...their usefulness really can&#039;t be beat.

&lt;strong&gt;Ryane, I was wondering what I wanted to write about today.  Your question just gave me my answer.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that is interesting. Why do you say so?? I mean, as a wearer of thongs, I do agree that at times, they are over-rated.  But in terms of how they look underneath certain clothing, pants and skirts etc&#8230;their usefulness really can&#8217;t be beat.</p>
<p><strong>Ryane, I was wondering what I wanted to write about today.  Your question just gave me my answer.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zipcode</title>
		<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zipcode]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restaurantrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A stupid message board I used to belong to when I was planning a wedding used to send text messages to other members with the words: PANTY or PANTIED 
it was really stupid, hence why I left and because well I am not planning a wedding.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A stupid message board I used to belong to when I was planning a wedding used to send text messages to other members with the words: PANTY or PANTIED<br />
it was really stupid, hence why I left and because well I am not planning a wedding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilahi</title>
		<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gilahi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restaurantrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t a guy send e-Boxers or e-TidyWhities?  And wouldn&#039;t a female recipient simply go &quot;ew&quot; and delete it?

&lt;strong&gt;I think we can agree that e-panties is a unisex term, and that intelligent members of both genders would be equally skeeved by such proposition.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a guy send e-Boxers or e-TidyWhities?  And wouldn&#8217;t a female recipient simply go &#8220;ew&#8221; and delete it?</p>
<p><strong>I think we can agree that e-panties is a unisex term, and that intelligent members of both genders would be equally skeeved by such proposition.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryane</title>
		<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restaurantrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E-panties, huh? I hope they were at least thongs.  Nothing would be worse than getting e-granny-panties.

&lt;strong&gt;something you never thought you&#039;d hear a man say: &lt;em&gt;thongs are overrated&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-panties, huh? I hope they were at least thongs.  Nothing would be worse than getting e-granny-panties.</p>
<p><strong>something you never thought you&#8217;d hear a man say: <em>thongs are overrated</em>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shannon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restaurantrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aw, I love y&#039;all, too.

Hey, Lem, we need to come up with a term for the posters who tell you what you ought to look like, and imply you cannot function without their input. Svenbloggies? Like an online svengali.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, I love y&#8217;all, too.</p>
<p>Hey, Lem, we need to come up with a term for the posters who tell you what you ought to look like, and imply you cannot function without their input. Svenbloggies? Like an online svengali.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemmonex</title>
		<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lemmonex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restaurantrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would NEVER teach you such things.

I don&#039;t like to think of them as stalkers, merely as people who need an extended trip to the &quot;spa&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would NEVER teach you such things.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like to think of them as stalkers, merely as people who need an extended trip to the &#8220;spa&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LivitLuvit</title>
		<link>http://restaurantrefugee.com/2008/07/08/new-vocabulary-word-e-panties/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LivitLuvit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://restaurantrefugee.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I LURVE it!!!

(Heaving e-panties)

Apparently I&#039;ve been showing off a lot of mine today anyway...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LURVE it!!!</p>
<p>(Heaving e-panties)</p>
<p>Apparently I&#8217;ve been showing off a lot of mine today anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

